Proto-Ronquian (a.k.a. Proto-Rompian) is the last common ancestor of the Ronquian languages; described here as reconstructed by T2. The name "Ronquian" comes from the reconstructed word for 'language':

roxʷ < *roŋxʷ < *əromb ARN
ɻɔ̃ʔ < *rɔ̃p < *əromb RT
rǒp < *rɔ̃p < *əromb RTJ
rɔm < *əromb MT
raj (< rV(V)(C) < *əromb) RTI
reː < *raj (< rV(V)(C) < *əromb) RRK

Initially the word for language was thought to be *roŋkʷ, and thus the name Proto-Ronquian was coined. However as serious reconstructing began, it became obvious that labiovelars were an innovation of A-Rox Ŋʷoskʷuɣmʲa from labials under some conditions and consequently the word for language was rather *romp. Therefore the term Proto-Rompian is more accurate. Nevertheless, Proto-Ronquian is more widely used.

Proto-Northwest-Tuysáfa was also sometimes used.

List of abbreviations:

Phonology

Sound inventory

Zju has suggested the following consonant inventory.

Consonants	Labial	Coronal	Dorsal	Uvular	Glottal
Fortis stop	p	t	k	q	ʔ
Lenis stop	b	d	g	ɢ
Fricative	f	s ɬ	x	χ	h
Sonorant	w	r l	j	ʀ
Nasal	m	n	ŋ	(ɴ)

R denotes a consonant phoneme of unknown quality that appears after a coronal onset and which is reflexed as w in RT and MT, but as retroflexing of the onset in RTJ. It was not deleted by the CRV > CVː sound change in MT, unlike most other liquids, but lengthened the following vowel nevertheless.
As there is very limited evidence for *ɴ in positions other than in front of word-final *ɢ, it's likely it didn't have phoneme status.

KathAveara has suggested the following consonant inventory.

Consonants	Labial	Coronal	Palatal	Velar	Labio-velar	Uvular	Glottal
V.less Stop	p	t		k	kʷ	q	ʔ
Voiced Stop	b	d		g	gʷ	ɢ
Fricative	f	s, ɬ		x	xʷ	χ
Approximant		l, r	j		w
Nasal	m	n		ŋ	ŋʷ	ɴ

Vowel inventory:

Vowels	Front	Back
High	i	u
Mid	e	o
Low	a

ə stands for a vowel of unknown quality that shows up variously as e or a and probably was one of either in PR. In premainsyllable interconsonantal position - CəCV(C) - ə may just be an artifact of the reconstruction and not have existed at all. Polysyllabic root are reconstructed for PR, however.

Due to its limited reconstruction in positions other than after stops, what is reconstructed as glottal stop may have not existed in PR at all; instead what are reconstructed as sequencies of voiceless and voiced stops followed by a glottal stop might have been respectively ejectives and implosives.

Allophony

One allophonic process can be safely reconstructed for PR.

Lenition

Onsets of strong syllables lenited intervocally when being a single consonant and in some consonant clusters:

hC > C
p t k q > b d g ɢ
f s ɬ x χ > w r l j ʀ (<β z ɮ ɣ ʁ at pre PR stage)
b d g ɢ > f s x χ
m n ŋ ɴ w r l j ʀ > m n ŋ ɴ w r l j ʀ (sonorants don't lenite)

Consonant clusters containing plain stops and non-stop consonant lenited only the stop:

*trip 'offense, insult'
*sədrip < *sətrip 'offenses, insults'

Clusters of a plain stop and a glottal stop also behaved in this way:

*əbʔik 'once' < *pʔik 'one'

Plosive series

On the account of allophonic processes * p t k q > * b d g ɢ and * b d g ɢ > * f s x χ, * p t k q and * b d g ɢ likely were * pʰ tʰ kʰ qʰ and * p t k q instead.

Phonotactics

At least the following sets of onsets are likely to have existed:

(h)(C)C(r l)(ʔ h j w)
NC
∅

Where C doesn't include glottal consonants and NC is a cluster of a homorgranic nasal and plain stop. It's quite possible that not all combinations of (h)(C)C(r l ʔ)(j w) were permitted.

When -j-, -ʔ- or -w- was infixed, any of preceding j, w, ʔ was deleted.

A liquid and ʔ were metathesized for the purpose of forming an ejective at a later stage.

The following codas seem to have been permitted:

Fortis stops: p t k q ʔ
Sonorants: w r l j ʀ
Nasals: m n ŋ ɴ
Nasal+lenis stops: mb nd ŋg ɴɢ

Strong syllables

Strong syllables probably carried some kind of tone or stress. Words had one and only one strong syllable.

Weak syllables

Weak (reduced) syllables had the same set of onsets as strong syllables. However they had no coda and a limited set of vowels, or only one vowel - ə. Additionally they were atonic or unstressed if there was phonemic tone or stress in PR.

It's possible that PR words had no weak syllables at all and only one syllable instead.

Grammar

PR grammar was largely analitical, however with some traces of inflectional morphology.

Nouns

Nouns likely had multiple ways of forming plural number, or it was that plurality was not yet a well defined category in PR and there were several concurrent ways of expressing plural meaning.
Many, if not all, of the following affixes were likely derivational rather than inflectional, which were later grammaticalised differently.

Prefixes

*ə- - forming construct state in some cases.
*h- - forming plural number in some cases.
*t- - paucal or collective prefix.
*m- - deverbal prefix forming abstract nouns.
*s(ə)- - deverbative prefix, perhaps for resultative nouns. A vowel was inserted before consonants.
*r- - augmentative prefix.
*Vr- - agent prefix.
*Vk- - instrumental prefix.

Infixes

*-j- - singulative infix, placed between onset and nucleus of the main syllable.
*-w- - plurative infix, placed between onset and nucleus of the main syllable, forming plural number in some cases.
A paucal infix of the shape *-nt- could also have existed.
*-ʔ- - of unknown exact function. An example is *pʔom 'hat' < *pom 'head'.
*-r- - diminutive infix.

The usage of singulative and plurative infix was lexicalised in some cases, if they were not originally a part of the derivational morphology in the first place.

Suffixes

*-t - dual or plural suffix
*-Ri - diminutive suffix.
*-nu - agent suffix.
*-(h)it - resultative suffix.
*-Ra - instrumental suffix.

Construct state

Construct state was formed by prefixing a lone vowel of unknown quality (probably already reduced in PR), which on its part triggered consonant lenition. That vowel was subsequently lost in most cases, leaving consonant lenition as the marker of the construct state.
There might have been some other changes involved in forming the construct state, such as deleting glottalic consonants in the onset.

The construct state had various functions, such as marking the possessee. It contrasted with absolute state, which was the unmarked form of the noun.

Verbs

A verb in PR was either transitive or intransitive - transitive verbs couldn't be used in intransitive constructions and vice versa. Instead, derivational morphology existed.

Attributive forms

Verbs had an attributive form, which essentially turned the verb into an adjective. It was formed by the prefix g-.

Affixes

Prefixes

*g- - turning verbs into adjectives(called attributive verbs). It had the allomorph *k- before voiced obstruents probably already in PR. Additionally the allomorphs *gə-, *kə- before certain consonant clusters existed either in PR or at a later stage.
*n- - antipassive prefix; reduces the valency of the verb, e.g. pʔi 'grow' > mpʔi 'grow up, become an adult'
*nr- - the state of resembling a noun.
*b- - turns adjectives and nouns into state verbs - 'to be X'
*ʀ- - forms abstract nouns
*m- - forms abstract nouns
*so- - forms causatives

Infixes

*-Ert- - reversing the meaning of a verb.

Suffixes

Particles

PR had at least the particle *ni for indicating plural number in nouns. It was placed before its head noun.
Two particles *t and *n also existed, marking the noun for paucal and/or plural number.

Pronouns & Determiners

Personal Pronouns

Proto-Ronquian had 3 persons in at least 3 numbers, singular, dual and plural. It also had a 3rd person collective pronoun. There may have been an animacy distinction in the 3rd person too.

	sing.	dual	plur.	coll.
1st	na	nat	haj
2nd	muŋ	mint < miŋt	wor
3rd Anim.	gi	gut		-
3rd Inan.	mdo			do

mdo seems to be formed from *do with prefixation of *m-; its connection with the other two *m- prefixes is unclear.

Indefinite Determiners

Demonstratives

Interrogative Determiners

Indefinite Quantifiers

Numerals

Proto-Ronquian uses a mixed base-6/24 number system. The basic numerals are reconstructed as:

	KathAveara		Zju
	cardinal	ordinal	cardinal	multiplier	ordinal
1	pʔik	mʔək	*pʔik	*əbʔik	*hmək
2	ki:	kso	*qis	*əɢis	*qzo
3	tʔuq	ntoq	*tʔuq	*ədʔuq	*ntoq
4	paɬ		pjaɬ, paɬ	*əbaɬ
5	fəɴ		fjaŋ, faŋ	əwjaŋ, əwaŋ
6	ɬja ~ ɬa		ɬja, ɬa	*ɐla
12	ɬat		*ɬat
18	qoɬ		*quɬ
24	tram		*tram

Numbers 4, 5, 6 had variants with and without singulative infix. Numbers 6 and 12 shared the same root, with 12 having dual suffix, and 6 having either the bare root or singulative infix.

The construct state of a numeral was used as a multiplier.

Syntax

Prepositions

There were two sets of prepositions - noun-like (nouns in construct state) and primary.

Sound changes

Sound changes preceeded by an interrogative are entirely speculative (or nearly so) and rather have the status of suggestions.

Conditions preceeded by an interrogative mark are unknown and/or speculative.

To A-Rox Ŋʷoskʷuɣmʲa

Tʔ > Tʼ
Tʼ > T / _V[-stress]
NT > NÞ > Þ / _#
V > ɐ / _[-full syllable]
ɬ > ʃ / _#
C > Cʲ / _i, ?
C > Cʷ / _u, ?
Cj Cw > Cʲ Cʷ / _V
P > Kʷ / ?_{a o u}
P > Kʷ / {o u}_#
C > Cʲ / {e i}_#, _Cʲ
C > Cʷ / {o u}_#, _Cʷ
ɬj ɬ > ʃʲ ʂ
q > χ / #_
ɐ > ɪ / _Cʲ; ʊ / _Cʷ
ʀ > ʁ
ɢʲ ɢ ɢʷ > ʁʲ ʁ ʁʷ
ɲʲ ŋʲ > nʲ
ɳʷ > nʷ
si > ʃi
tj > tʃ

N > Þ / _# NB: Only two cases found, neither from an original NT coda, details about this SC are unclear. It may or may not be connected with NT > NÞ > Þ / _#.
It may also have not occured at all, but rather such a correspondance being raised via a single consonant suffix being attached to those two words('thou' and 'five') before NT > NÞ > Þ / _#.

To Mhakh Thandim

T[-voice]ʔ > Tʼ
b > w / V_V
tr > dr / V_V
drV dlV > rV[+length] lV[+length]
CC{ʔ r l w j s}V > C{ʔ r l w j s}V[+length]
C{ʔ r l w j s}V > CV[+length]
md sd ng rg > mr sr nl rl
rl > ral
ŋ > ʔ / #_VN
D T > T Tʰ
? ʀ > ∅ / _VC[+uvular]
ʀV, Vʀ > V[+breathy]
hN > N[-voice]
hV hCV > V[+breathy] CV[+breathy]
? Vh > V[+breathy]
q > h / #_
? g > h / #_, ?
q > ʔ / _#
ɬ l > u / _#
ɬ > s / #_
? V > a/ə / ?
ek > ak / _#, ?
ij uw ow > ii uu uu
a o u e i > ə ɔ ʊ ɛ ɪ
jɛ > e
aa oo uu ee ii > a o u e i
CCC Cj > CCəC Cɪj / ?
Q > K
NT > N / _#
? NT > N[-voice] / #_
hV > jV[+breathy]
? k kʼ > ʔ / #_[+ ?]
NT > ND / V_V
x > χ
pʰ tʰ kʰ > ɸ θ x / _#, #_
p t k > pʰ tʰ kʰ / when not in CCs; however #_TV is a valid condition
m > ∅ / #_u
ɸ > w / V_V
r > j / i_, rV_, _#, ?

At some point there was a reduplication process word initially that affected some of the words, which took place before changing NT clusters. The reduplicated vowel was a, which agreed in length with the main vowel.

Metathesis of onset consonants also took place, e.g. in klu /kʰlʊ/ destroy, but salcu /səlʔʊ/ destruction, ruin < *lku, *s(a)-lku

To Ronc Tyu

? u > o / [+uvular]_
Q > K
V > ∅ / [-full syllable] (almost unconditional - some RT words are not monosyllabic)
regressive voicing assimilation (e.g. sd > zd)
D > N / _[+stop]
C[-stop +voice]V > C[-stop +voice]V[+mid tone] / ?
? CwV > CwV[+high tone]
ʔV > V[+low tone]
C[+stop +voice] > C[+nasal] / _V[+low tone]
C[+stop +voice]V > C[+stop -voice]V[+mid tone]
hNV > NV[+high tone] / #_
md > mr > nr > ndr > nɖʐ
zt > zd > d
sm > sb > zb > b
tr > r / #_
q χ ɴ > g x ŋ
s > ʣ / #_, ? (or was it tz/dz > ʣ with initial d being lost elsewhere?)
j > dʑ / #_V[+full syllable], ?
∅ > j / #_i
Simplification of consonant clusters in the onset leads to new voiced consonants.
hV > hV[+mid tone]
h > ∅ / N_V
hC[-voiced obstruent]{w y ∅}V[+mid tone] > C[-voiced obstruent]{w y ∅}V[+high tone]
t d k g > ts dz tɕ dʑ / _{V[+front] j}
s > r / #_V, ?
r > ∅ / #_u, ?
ɬ > u / _#
ɬ > ∅ / #_j
ɬ > l / #_, ?
ɬ > hl / #_, ?
ij uw aː> iə uə aə / ?
ja wa > iə uə
ij uw > ɛɪ ɔʊ / ?
aj aw > ɛɪ ɔʊ / ?
aL > a
a > o / _{p m}
VN(T) > V[+nasal](T) / _#
p t k > ʔ / _#
tj dj kj gj sj zj ŋj lj rj wj > ts dz tɕ dʑ ɕ ʑ nj j j j
x > ɕ / _V[+front]
x > h
kwu > ku

Evidence from the multiplier numbers (mìc nòc < *bʔik *dʔuq < *əbʔik *ədʔuk < *pʔik *tʔuk) suggests that all instances of a nasal followed by low tone vowel could go back to clusters of a voiced stop and glottal stop.

Construct state development

Construct state fell out of RT when unstressed vowels were deleted and initial consonant clusters were simplified. This completely distorted lenition patterns, they become unproductive and soon ceased to be used. Marking possession by simple juxtapostion without any morphological change is the sole reflex of the construct state.

To Rrób Tè Jĕhnò

Tʔ > Tʼ
Vɬ > V[+length] / _#
tr > dr / V_V
VN > V[+nasal +low tone] /_#
VNT > V[+nasal +what tone?]T / _#
? VNT > V[+nasal +?]T / V_V
C[+stop]N[+voice] > N[-voice]
hN > N[-voice]
NT > əT ~ əD / #_, ?
? ja aj > e / ?, eː /?
? wa aw > o / ?, oː /?
? ẽ õ → ɛ̃ ɔ̃
Vʀ > Vː
oɬ > oː
wi > uː
i u > e o / _#
V[+nasal] > V[-nasal +length] / lengthens only in open syllables
V[+?] > V[+low tone] / ?
V[-low tone] > V[+high tone]
V > V[+low tone] / N_C
D > N / _V[+low tone]
D T > T Tʰ
V > ə / _[-full syllable]
? l N > ə / #_C, ?
rk > rək
q > k / _i
? u > o / [+uvular]_
? səf > sf > fʰ / _[+full syllable] (? sC > Cʰ)
? sʔ > sʰ
kC[+obstruent -aspiration -ejectiveness] > Cʰ
kN[+voice] > N[-voice]
regressive PoA assimilation for stops
C[+stop]C[+stop] > C[+stop]əC[+stop]
C[+stop -aspiration]h > C[+stop +aspiration]
kw kʰ kʼw > p pʰ pʼ
ə > e / [+full syllable]

Retroflection and r loss

r stands for any liquid other than lʲ

tʰr tr tʼr > ʈʰ ʈ ʈʼ
tsʰr tsr tsʼr > ʈʰ ʈ ʈʼ
tɕʰr tɕr tɕʼr > ʈʰ ʈ ʈʼ
kʰr kr kʼr > ʈʰ ʈ ʈʼ
qr qʼr qʰr > ʀ
hr > r[-voice]
sr sʰr ɕr ɕʰr xr xʰr χr χʰr > ʂ ʂʰ ʂ ʂʰ ʂ ʂʰ ʂ ʂʰ
ɬr ɬʰr ɬʲr ɬʲʰr > ꞎ ꞎʰ ꞎ ꞎʰ (ɬ[+retroflex])
lr ʎr > ər
rt rtʼ rtʰ > ʈ ʈʼ ʈʰ
rts rtsʼ rtsʰ > ʈ ʈʼ ʈʰ
rtɕ rtɕʼ rtɕʰ > ʈ ʈʼ ʈʰ
rk rkʼ rkʰ > ʈ ʈʼ ʈʰ
rs rsʰ rɕ rɕʰ > ʂ ʂʰ ʂ ʂʰ
nr rn > ɳ
r > ∅ / {V C}_C

Palatalisation

s sʰ tʰ t tʼ ɫ > ɕ ɕʰ tsʰ ts tsʼ ɬʲ / _V[+front]
tʰ t tʼ > tsʰ ts tsʼ / #_(a?)
ts > ʦ
sj sʰj tʰj tj tʼj ɫj > ɕ ɕʰ tsʰ ts tsʼ ɬʲ
k kʰ kʼ > tɕ tɕʰ tɕʼ / _V[+front]
kj kʰj kʼj > tɕ tɕʰ tɕʼ
klʲ kʰlʲ kʼlʲ > tɕ tɕʰ tɕʼ
nj ŋj > ɲ
n ŋ > ɲ / _V[+front]

χ loss

χ > ɕ / _V[+front]
χ > h / ?
χ > f / ?

To Ray Tyuwey Išup

As of now not necessarily in chronological order.

ʔ ʀ > ∅ w
s f x χ > h
t n l > ty ny ly / _i
kj gj > c dz
k g ŋ > č dž ň
q ɢ ɴ > k g ŋ
pm tn čň kn > p t č k / #_
Vn > V[+nasal]
m n > w r / ?
č > š
t > s / ?
dz dž b d g > c č m n ŋ
V[+nasal] > V[-nasal][+other quality]
CC > CiC / some clusters only

To Ree Rɛɛ Kıbyaa

sn sm > st sp
m > v / _VN
m > ∅ / #_u
D > T
Tʔ > D
Q > K
i > ɨ / K_
i > ɨ / ?
tr > tw
s > ʃ
ɬ > s / #_
ɬ > l / _#
VN > V[+length]
p’ t’ k’ b d > b d g v r / V_V
n > r / ? #_V
?i ?ɨ ?e > ı u a
?iː ?ɨː ?ɛː > ɛː aː ːɨ

Important correspondances

Numerals comparison

	RTJ	RT	MT	ARN	pre ARN	RRK	ƏT	RTI	PR
1	p’íg	pìc	p’ikh	pʲik	*pjik²	bik	bek	piš	*pʔik
2	kú	káe	hí	x̠i	*qi	kıı	kuś	čey	*qis
3	t’úgh	tòc	t’uc	tʷ'uq	*tʔuq	duk	dok	truk	*tʔuq
4	pé	pyáo	phau	ʃʷaʃ	*xwaʃ³	pal	pel	pal	pjaɬ, paɬ
5	fàì	fyein	fang	ʃʷax̠	*fjax̠	huu	fən	huu	fjaŋ, faŋ
6	dlyă	yé	sa	ŋʷoʃkʲe	*ʃe	sa	ɬa	sa	ɬja, ɬa
12	dlád	lác	sath	ʂat		sat	ɬat	šat	*ɬat
18	khó	kóu	hú	(24: x̠oʃ)		kol	qul	kol	*quɬ
24	crà	tróun	thám	(36:sram)		twaa	trən	tree	*tram

¹ In RTJ none of qʰ q qʼ appears before /i/.
² The singulative infix -j- was inserted, which deleted the glottal stop.
³ The plurative infix -w- was likely inserted, which caused the dissimilation pw > xw to occur, which was subsequently assimilated to ʃw, due to the influence of coda ʃ. This onset ʃʷ later replaced the original onset in the word for 5.

4, 5 and 6 all seem to have had variants with and without the singulative infix.

Pronouns comparison

Onset correspondances

The following correspondances are only for single consonants or the specified clusters word initially; word-medial consonants and different word-initial clusters often have different reflexes.

PR, *	RT	RTJ	MT	RTI	RRK
p t k q	p t k/tś¹ k ˥	p t/c¹ k/tr/q¹ kh	ph th kh k/c/h²	p t/tr/ty¹ č k	p t k k
pʔ tʔ kʔ qʔ	p t k/tś¹ k ˩	pʼ tʼ/cʼ/crʼ¹ kʼ/trʼ/qʼ¹ khʼ/qʼ¹	pʼ tʼ kʼ/c/h² kʼ/c²	p t/tr/ty¹ č/c/š¹² k	b d kʼ/g² g
b d g ɢ	p t k/tś¹ k ˧	b d/z¹ g/j¹ gh	p t k/c/h² h	p t/tr/ty¹ č/c¹ k	pʼ/b² tʼ kʼ/g/s² kʼ
bʔ dʔ gʔ	m n ŋ ˩	b d/z¹ g/j¹	b d g/c²	m n/ň¹ ň	m n ŋ
pm tn kŋ	m/mb² n ng/ngg² ˥	hm hn/hny¹ hng/hny¹	mh nh ngh	p t/tr/ty¹ č/c¹	p t k/ng²
m n ŋ	m n ŋ ˧	m n/ny¹ ng	m n ng	w r ň/y²	v r ŋ/y²
ʔm	m ˩	hm	b	(m)	m
f fł	f fw ˧	f ł	f fV:	h h/w?²	h/pʼ² s
h	h ˧	h	h	h	h
j	y ˧	y	y	y	y/∅²
l	l ˧	l/ly¹	l	l/ly¹	l
ł	l ˥	dl/dly/dlr¹	s/l²	š	s
r	r ˧	r	r	r	r
ʀ	x ˧	gr	y/w/[+breathiness]²	w	g/∅²
s	s/ś¹ ˧	s/x¹	s	h	š
w	w ˧	w	w	w	w/v/∅²
x	h/y?² ˧	v	x	h	?
χ	fw?/ś/h² ˧	f/x²	x	h	h

¹ Conditioning due to palatalisation and/or retroflexion.

² Unknown conditioning.

Intervocalic correspondances

MT	RT	RTJ	PR
r		ʈʂ
r		ʈ
mb		m	bʔ
nd	∅	n	dʔ
jV[+breathy]	h	h
l	g	tɕʰ
r		ʈʂ

Nucleus correspondances

Assuming no coda.

PR, *	MT	RT	RTJ	RTI	RRK	ARN	ƏD
a o u e i
aj oj uj ej ij
aw ow uw ew iw

Coda correspondances

MT	RT	RTJ	RTI	PR
m n ŋ ŋ	~	∅	∅	m n ŋ ɴ
m n ŋ ŋ	~ʔ	p t k q	m n ɲ ɲ	mb nd ŋg ɴɢ
ɸ θ x ʔ	ʔ	p t k q	p t~s ʃ k	p t k q

Lexicon

The partially reconstructed lexicon is available here: Ronquian Etymological Dictionary

Internal reconstruction

In all likelihood the liquid series comes from voiced fricative series:

w r l j ʀ < β z ɮ ɣ ʁ

Firstly, this makes the reconstruction of two stop series - voiceless and voiced - all the more more likely. And secondly, it raises the question was there ɦ, and if it was present, what are its reflexes? Some or all of w, r, l, j could already have been present before this shift, however.

Proto-Ronquian

Phonology

Sound inventory

Allophony

Lenition

Plosive series

Phonotactics

Strong syllables

Weak syllables

Grammar

Nouns

Prefixes

Infixes

Suffixes

Construct state

Verbs

Attributive forms

Affixes

Prefixes

Infixes

Suffixes

Particles

Pronouns & Determiners

Personal Pronouns

Indefinite Determiners

Demonstratives

Interrogative Determiners

Indefinite Quantifiers

Numerals

Syntax

Prepositions

Sound changes

To A-Rox Ŋʷoskʷuɣmʲa

To Mhakh Thandim

To Ronc Tyu

Construct state development

To Rrób Tè Jĕhnò

Retroflection and r loss

Palatalisation

χ loss

To Ray Tyuwey Išup

To Ree Rɛɛ Kıbyaa

Important correspondances

Numerals comparison

Pronouns comparison

Onset correspondances

Intervocalic correspondances

Nucleus correspondances

Coda correspondances

Lexicon

Internal reconstruction

Navigation menu

Search